THE GOLD STANDARD
A 1999
International Teleconference Presentation
by A I S Alexander
Throughout history, money has taken many forms. But the
precious
metals, gold and silver, have always been favored as money
because
of their physical, chemical, and esthetic
characteristics. The precious
metals are beautiful; they are relatively
rare; they are readily minted
into uniform and identifiable forms, such as
coins and bullion bars;
and for all of these reasons, they are universally
desired as stores
of value, and universally accepted in exchange for all
other goods
and services. These reasons are both necessary and
sufficient to
establish the precious metals as the historical money par
excellence.
Gold, and the gold standard, have had a symbolic
significance,
in addition to their practical use in facilitating
trade: they have
always represented real value, integrity, responsibility,
productivity--
and an ever-increasing standard of living.
The gold standard was the world standard during the
Nineteenth Century,
an era of rapidly increasing wealth and liberty
throughout the world.
Gold was the standard for international trade and the
international
money and capital markets. Gold was the medium of
exchange which
spread capitalism, industrialism, and an ever-increasing
standard
of living into the remotest parts of the world, destroying
ancient
prejudices and superstitions, sowing the seeds of new life
and
well-being, freeing minds, creating incentives, and
generating
unprecedented wealth. Gold offered the prospect of uniting
all
peoples into a world community cooperating peacefully with
one
another. Thus, the gold standard was both the means and the
symbol
of this greatest and most beneficial of all historical
developments.
The gold standard is a market generated
phenomenon. It evolves and
functions spontaneously and independently of
governments. Its preser-
vation and operation does not depend upon the
existence of implementing
laws or government interference. It requires
only that governments
abstain from deliberately sabotaging it. And it
results in the optimal
cooperation of all productive people in the world
marketplace.
It is important to understand how the Gold Standard
operates. This is
best illustrated with a diagram--which I cannot share
with you over the
telephone. But it is very simple; I will describe it,
and then summarize
the key points in a few words which you can jot down for
future reference.
Let us start with an economy that is in
equilibrium. Suddenly, there
is an increase in the supply of gold: gold
is discovered in California,
in the Yukon, in South Africa, or
wherever. An increased supply of gold
means an increased supply of
money, but not an increase in the goods
and services which are exchanged for money;
therefore, an increased
supply of money, other things being equal, will
result in increased prices
throughout the economy. However, if domestic
prices are increasing,
then cheaper goods and services will be purchased and
imported
from abroad, and so imports from foreigners will
increase. Further,
if domestic prices are increasing, then foreigners
will buy fewer
domestically produced goods and services, and so exports to
foreigners
will decrease. Therefore, the effect of more gold in
circulation will
be to increase imports and to decrease exports. But
this imbalance
of trade must be paid for. How? By exporting
gold. And when gold
is exported, then the domestic money supply
decreases and domestic
prices decrease; and thus the stimulus which upset the
original
equilibrium--namely, more gold--is self-correcting.
If you have paper and pencil handy, you might want
to jot down these
seven steps. 1: Gold supply up. 2: Prices of
goods and services up.
3: Imports of goods and services up. 4: Exports
of goods and services
down. 5: Gold exports up. 6: Gold supply
down. 7: Prices down.
Again, because gold is universally desired as a
medium of exchange
and store of value, the stimulus which upset the
equilibrium--
more gold--is self-correcting. This negative feedback, or
economic
servomechanism, functions in a totally free market to keep
production,
prices, trade, and consumption in optimal balance.
* * *
The gold standard makes the determination of the
monetary unit's
purchasing power independent of the policies of
governments,
political parties, and pressure groups; it removes the
determina-
tion of the purchasing power of money from the political
arena.
The main objection raised against the gold standard
is that the
prime factor in the determination of prices is something
which
no government can control--the profitability of gold
production--
which is itself in dynamic equilibrium with the profitability
of
producing all other goods and services. Therefore, an
"automatic"
market-generated factor restrains a national government's
ability
to inflate the supply of money and manipulate the purchasing
power
of money.
The enemies of the gold standard spurn, as its
alleged vice, the very
thing that is its main virtue: namely, its
incompatibility with a policy
of inflation and unlimited credit expansion.
It is a fundamental
economic truth that no one can be made richer by
printing more
paper money. The official abhorrence of the gold standard
is due to
the myth that omnipotent governments can create wealth out of
little
scraps of paper.
Granted that the purchasing power of gold is not
perfectly stable.
But the very notion of stability of purchasing power is
absurd.
In a continually changing world, there can be no such thing
as
stability of purchasing power. But the adversaries of the
gold
standard do not want the purchasing power of money to be
stable;
rather, they want governments to be able to manipulate
the
purchasing power of money without being constrained
by the
monetary discipline of the gold
standard.
During the gold rushes of the Nineteenth Century,
the rapidly
increasing supply of gold provoked attacks upon the gold
standard
as being INflationary. Somewhat later, when the supplies of
goods
and services increased faster than gold production, this
provoked
other attacks upon the gold standard as being DEflationary.
The
foes of the gold standard were demanding an intensification of
the prevailing
upward trend of prices and wages: they wanted to lower
the monetary unit's
purchasing power at an ever-accelerating rate.
Such a policy of inflationism is always popular: it
appears to
increase wages. But its popularity is due to a
misunderstanding
of its effects. What people are really asking for is a
rise in the
prices of the goods and services they are selling,
while the prices
of the goods and services they are buying remain
unchanged.
In the long run, of course, this is impossible.
In the words of the great Austrian economist,
Ludwig von Mises:
"For the naive mind there is something miraculous in the
issuance
of government fiat paper money. A magic word spoken by
the
government creates out of nothing a thing which can be
exchanged
against any merchandise a person could desire. How pale is
the
art of sorcerers, witches, and conjurors when compared with that
of
the government's treasury department! Professors tell us that
the
government can raise all the money it needs by printing it;
allegedly,
inflation can solve all problems."
Inflation may appear to be benign as long as the
housewife thinks:
"I need a new frying pan today. But prices are too
high today;
I shall wait until prices are lower." The critical stage
begins
when the housewife thinks: "I don't need a new frying
pan;
I may need it in a year to two; but I'll buy it
today because it
will be much more expensive later." Now the
catastrophic end
of the inflation is near. In its last stage
the housewife thinks
"I don't need any more frying pans; I'll never need any
more
frying pans. But it's wiser to buy something tangible
with
these scraps of paper that the government calls money,
than to hang on to them until they become
worthless."
Inflation ceases to work as soon as the populace
becomes aware
of its effects upon the monetary unit's purchasing power.
In the
early stages of an inflation, only a very few people discern
what
is going on, manage their business affairs in accordance with
this
insight, and deliberately aim at reaping inflation gains.
The vast majority
of people are too dull to grasp what is really
happening. Filled with
indignation, they attack as "profiteers"
those few who are astute enough to
understand and take
advantage of the real causes of the
inflation. Public ignorance
is the indispensable basis of the inflationary
policy.
But is it rational to base a monetary system upon
the intentional
deception of the great majority of the citizens?
Obviously not.
Such a policy is self-defeating. Eventually, the masses
come
to understand the schemes of their rulers; and then the clever
plans
of the inflationists collapse. Inflationism is not a
reasonable
alternative to a sound money policy: it is difficult,
if not impossible, to
stop an inflationary spiral before the
masses have seen through their rulers'
schemes.
* * *
Those who are intent upon maintaining political
power and political
favoritism have always wanted to sabotage the evolution
toward
increased prosperity, peace, and liberty. They loathed the
gold
standard, not only because of its economic value, but also because
it
was symbolic of all those doctrines and policies they wanted
to destroy. Nationalists and isolationists
fight the gold standard
because they want to sever their countries from the
world market-
place and establish national autarky. Interventionist
governments
and pressure groups fight the gold standard because they
consider
it the most serious obstacle to their desires to manipulate
prices
and wages. But the most fanatical attacks against gold are
made
by those who believe that unlimited expansion of bank credit is
the
panacea for all economic ills. They believe that unlimited
expansion
of bank credit could lower or even entirely abolish interest
rates,
raise wages and prices for the benefit of everyone, free the
State
from the necessity of balancing its budget--in short, make
all
decent people prosperous and happy. They believe that only the
gold
standard, that devilish contrivance of the wicked and stupid
classical
economists, prevents mankind from attaining everlasting
prosperity.
And thus John Maynard Keynes, the ideological
father of deficit
spending, proclaimed in the British House of Lords, on May
23, 1944,
that gold was "a barbarous relic." And whoever today suggests
that
the world should return to the gold standard is dismissed as a
lunatic.
Credit expansion based on fiat money can produce a
temporary boom, but
at the cost of making economic calculation
impossible. The basis of the
boom is funny-money, not an increase in
capital goods. The inevitable
failure of all political attempts at
credit expansion based on fiat money
results in recurrent economic crises--the boom-bust
cycles which
have occurred throughout history.
And now these political prophets without vision are
trying to con us
once again--with electronic money which is nothing more than
blips
on computer screens. A stable and automatically balanced
economy
must be based upon a monetary system that involves a
universally
accepted medium of exchange AND store of value.
Historically,
only the precious metals--predominantly gold--have met these
criteria.
Neither fiat money nor electronic money is a store of value; and
so
the eventual results of electronic money will be the same as those
of
fiat money: hyperinflation, a massive loss of confidence, an
unprecedented
level of economic chaos, and deep depression
and destruction of the world's capital base.
It is inevitable.
Indeed, all government interference with market
phenomena must fail
to achieve the ends sought. We call this the "180
degree phenomenon."
A discussion of this crucially important subject is
beyond the scope
of today's presentation, but it is covered in the offshore
seminars.
When an interventionist government tries to remedy the
negative
effects of its previous actions by intervening further and
further,
it eventually converts its country's economic system into
socialism.
It then abolishes the domestic market altogether, and with it
money,
even though it may maintain some of the terms and trappings of
the
market economy. But in any event, it is not the gold standard
that
frustrates the intentions of the political authorities; it is
their
own
contradictions.
* * *
We must understand that the gold standard has never
failed.
Governments have tried to abolish it in order to
pave the way for inflation--
to expand credit without limits in order to
lower interest rates and
to improve the balance of trade. It is obvious
that the gold standard
cannot function properly if the buying, selling, and
possession of gold
is illegal, and legions of judges, gendarmes, and
informers are busily
enforcing the law. The whole grim apparatus of
oppression and coercion--
policemen, custom guards, penal courts, prisons, in
some countries even
executioners--had to be used to destroy the gold
standard. Solemn pledges
were broken, retroactive laws were
promulgated, provisions of constitutions
and bills of rights were openly defied. And
legions of servile writers praised
what governments had done and hailed the dawn
of the fiat-money millenium.
The most remarkable thing about this allegedly new
monetary policy,
however, is its complete failure. It substituted fiat
money in the
domestic markets for sound money, and favoured the interests of
some individuals and groups of individuals at the
expense of others.
It also contributed to the disintegration of the
international
division of labor. But it did not succeed in eliminating
gold from
its position as the international world standard. Gold has
achieved
its eminence, and it will retain its eminence, because millions
of
participants in the world marketplace voluntarily prefer it to
all
other forms of money. If you glance at the financial pages of
any
newspaper you discover that gold is still the world's money, and
not
the colorful products of the various government printing
presses.
No government is powerful enough to abolish the
gold standard.
Gold is the money of international trade and the economic
community
of mankind. It cannot be affected by the actions of
governments
whose sovereignty is limited to definite countries. It does
not
matter that governments confiscate gold coins and bullion, or
that
they seize and punish those holding gold as felons. He who buys
or
sells on a foreign market calculates the advantages and
disadvantages
of such transactions in terms of gold. If a government
wants to
sever its domestic price structure from that of the world
market,
it must resort to other measures, such as prohibitive import
and
export duties and embargoes. Nationalization of foreign
trade,
whether effected openly or indirectly by foreign exchange
control,
does not eliminate gold: The world's medium of exchange is still
gold.
The policy of all contemporary governments to
denigrate gold is not
an isolated phenomenon. It is an integral part of
the almost universal
process of destruction which is the hallmark of our era:
the denigra-
tion of values, integrity, responsibility, productivity, and
prosperity.
Governments want to substitute economic isolationism for free
trade,
plunder for production, poverty for prosperity, political power
and
control for individual liberty, and war for peace. They are
trying
to fake Reality, and in the long run, Reality cannot be
faked.
The Gold Standard will always remain inviolate as
both the means
and the symbol of integrity, prosperity, and peace on
Earth.
* * *
(This discussion is based on Ludwig von Mises' THE
THEORY OF MONEY
AND CREDIT; Murray Rothbard's WHAT HAS GOVERNMENT
DONE
TO OUR MONEY?; Elgin Groseclose's MONEY AND MAN: A
Survey
of Monetary Experience; and Hans Sennholz, ed.,
GOLD IS MONEY.)